Published on 00/00/0000
Last updated on 00/00/0000
Published on 00/00/0000
Last updated on 00/00/0000
Share
Share
INSIGHTS
8 min read
Share
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications can sometimes feel opaque and confusing. Given the black-box nature of large language models (LLMs), users often find it challenging to connect the dots between the prompts they input and the responses they receive.
Nonetheless, the enterprises building GenAI-powered applications, and the users of those applications, want effective AI interactions. These interactions should be:
In this quest for effective AI interactions, two techniques have gained considerable traction: prompt intelligence and prompt engineering. Although these terms are sometimes used interchangeably or confused with each other, they are completely different processes, each with its own distinct set of considerations. Prompt intelligence and prompt engineering also have distinct roles to play in optimizing interactions with GenAI applications.
Both prompt engineering and prompt intelligence are relatively new concepts within the GenAI space. They’re also rapidly evolving as GenAI technology matures and adoption widens.
Prompt engineering is the process of crafting specific inputs to guide AI outputs with a focus on precision and control. In other words, prompt engineers design highly specific and verbose instructions for a GenAI application to follow to elicit a desired output reliably.
Prompt intelligence is the process of continuously analyzing user prompts and application responses in order to refine and enhance the application’s accuracy, relevance, and efficiency. It also helps application builders better understand how users are leveraging the application and how well the system actually helps them achieve their goals.
Keep these high-level definitions in mind as we take a closer look at each.
Prompt engineering is the process of crafting and refining prompts to elicit desired responses from AI models.
Although the most commonly used AI models (such as GPT-4o, Gemma, Mistral, and Llama 3) are adept at filling in missing context, they perform best when given clear, verbose, and specific instructions. Depending on the complexity of the task you want the AI to execute, your prompt should contain one or more of the following components:
To demonstrate why prompt engineering is important, imagine an ecommerce enterprise with customer data, including purchase history, stored in a structured SQL database. We want non-technical employees, such as marketers, to ask questions in natural language to extract information from the database.
To build this system, we would need a phase in the process where the LLM generates an SQL query that answers the question asked. Here are two examples of this using ChatGPT:
In the example above, we’ve given very little instruction on what needs to be done, and ChatGPT has attempted to fill the gaps wherever possible. The output that you see here is not necessarily usable for the following reasons:
Contrast the above attempt with the following interaction:
This interaction is much more reliable, stable, and robust. We’re extremely clear on what database we’re using, the columns in our table, and the output we expect from the AI.
We could try running both prompts multiple times. In all likelihood, the second prompt will produce the same correct output every single time, while the first prompt will produce a wide range of varying responses.
Basic prompt engineering techniques include the following guidance:
With systematic and effective prompt engineering, you’ve managed to reliably elicit correct responses from your GenAI application. Will this always translate directly to a successful application?
Unfortunately, the answer is no. This is because it’s often difficult to predict how users will interact with your application. You may often find that actual user prompts differ dramatically from the example prompts that came out of your prompt engineering efforts. Or perhaps your users are using the GenAI application for purposes entirely different from what you originally intended or expected.
Prompt intelligence is essential for these reasons. It is only by analyzing user prompts and AI responses that you can achieve AI model optimization to improve future interactions.
By continuously refining your application based on the feedback you receive, you ensure that the accuracy and relevance of AI responses improve. Those refinements may take the form of underlying model fine-tuning, application enhancements, or providing better prompt-crafting guidance to your users.
Prompt intelligence also yields insights into how your GenAI application is actually being used (versus what you may have envisioned). This gives enterprises more clarity on the application's potential ROI, helping them identify the best opportunities to increase performance.
Ultimately, prompt intelligence increases user satisfaction by continuously improving AI interactions to be more consistent, clear, and dependable.
Prompt engineering and prompt intelligence are neither in opposition to each other nor act as alternatives. The two techniques are complementary. To build a successful AI application, both should be used together.
The insights you gain from prompt intelligence can better inform prompt engineering practices. Engineered prompts, in turn, can be continuously deployed and monitored, generating valuable data for prompt intelligence. In this way, both techniques work together to create a cycle of continuous improvement.
Again, consider the database-backed GenAI system from our earlier example. This time, let’s assume that the application fields questions from marketers by accessing a repository of PDF documents.
In the first iteration of prompt engineering, you may provide concise information to your end users. However, through prompt intelligence, you may discover that your users find it hard to trust the application’s answers and take them at face value.
To refine your application, you can direct the AI to provide additional context for its responses, always including the data source (such as the PDF location, page number, and line number). This refinement would drastically increase your users’ trust in the application.
Prompt engineering focuses on designing instructions that generate correct and stable outputs from GenAI applications. On the other hand, prompt intelligence is concerned with insights into how users and AI interact with one another and the value it creates. Enterprises pursuing GenAI innovations can use both techniques together to build applications with effective AI interactions that score high in user satisfaction.
When it comes to concerns around data privacy or the effectiveness and trustworthiness of GenAI applications, Outshift by Cisco is the authoritative resource. As your enterprise leans on Outshift through its GenAI journey, continue your learning with the following helpful resources:
Get emerging insights on innovative technology straight to your inbox.
GenAI is full of exciting opportunities, but there are significant obstacles to overcome to fulfill AI’s full potential. Learn what those are and how to prepare.
The Shift is Outshift’s exclusive newsletter.
The latest news and updates on generative AI, quantum computing, and other groundbreaking innovations shaping the future of technology.